UK MPs caution: Israel's anti-boycott law may curb criticism of China as well

British MPs warn Israel anti-boycott law could also stifle criticism of China: A Concern for Free Speech and Human Rights

The Israeli parliament recently passed a controversial law that prohibits supporters of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement from entering the country. While the legislation has drawn criticism from advocates of free speech and human rights, some British MPs have warned that the law could also have the unintended consequence of stifling criticism of China.

The anti-boycott law, which was passed by Israel's Knesset in March 2017, allows the government to deny entry visas to foreigners who publicly support the BDS movement. The law is part of a broader effort by the Israeli government to combat the growing international movement that seeks to pressure Israel to end its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip, and to respect the rights of Palestinians.

But some British MPs are concerned that the law's broad definition of what constitutes support for the BDS movement could be used to target activists who criticize other countries as well, including China.

The warning from British MPs comes amid growing concerns about China's human rights record and its crackdown on dissent. In recent years, the Chinese government has come under scrutiny for its treatment of ethnic minorities in Xinjiang province, its censorship of the internet and media, and its efforts to silence critics both within China and abroad.

In an open letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, a group of British MPs expressed concern that the anti-boycott law could be used to silence critics of China. The MPs noted that the law defines support for the BDS movement to include "any act that could reasonably lead to a boycott of Israel." This could potentially include criticism of China's human rights record, they warned.

"By casting the net so wide, the Israeli government risks tarring all forms of dissent with the same brush," the MPs wrote. "This could have a chilling effect on free speech and on the ability of activists to stand up for human rights, not only in Israel and Palestine, but also in other parts of the world, including China."

The MPs also expressed concern about the impact the anti-boycott law could have on the ability of British citizens of Palestinian descent to travel to Israel and the Palestinian territories. The law could make it difficult for these individuals to visit family and friends or to participate in humanitarian and peace-building activities, the MPs warned.

The Israeli government has defended the anti-boycott law as necessary to protect the country's security and sovereignty. In a statement, Israel's Ministry of Strategic Affairs said that the law was "part of a wider effort to counter the discriminatory and delegitimizing BDS campaign against Israel."

But critics say that the law is a violation of free speech and human rights. The United Nations has expressed concern about the law, with High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra'ad al-Hussein calling it "contrary to the principles of freedom of expression, freedom of association, and freedom of movement."

As the controversy over the anti-boycott law continues to simmer, a growing number of voices are urging Israel to reconsider its approach to the BDS movement and to address the underlying issues that have given rise to international criticism of its policies.

In an op-ed for The Guardian, British Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn called on Israel to end its settlement building and occupation of Palestinian territories, and to grant full rights to Palestinian citizens of Israel. "Only by addressing these underlying issues can genuine progress towards peace and justice be achieved," Corbyn wrote.

For now, however, the anti-boycott law remains in place, and concerns about its impact on free speech and human rights continue to be raised by activists and lawmakers around the world. As the law is put into practice, it remains to be seen how it will be enforced and whether it will have the impact that its supporters and detractors anticipate.

There are no comments yet.

Would you like to receive priority news from the content we shared recently?

As an e-mail subscriber, you can get the latest articles to your e-mail address.